Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts. (You can view my privacy policy here.)


 

RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)

Topics

A pressing need for regulation …

In 2012, when I clicked on a link in order to watch a family friend appear in front of the Leveson Inquiry, I little realised just how much the subject of press regulation would get under my skin. Sometimes in a good way. But, all too often, it’s more like formication.

I wrote about Leveson at the time. In the five years that have passed since then, I have attended several dozen seminars on the subject of press conduct, publicly castigated the chairman of one press regulator and privately debated with the chairman of another.

 It is beyond irony that those very freedoms are being used to flood the public with misinformation in a campaign to get the government to bend to the publishers’ will.

Along the way, I have met a number of journalists who would like to see a change in the way the industry conducts itself and many of the folk at Hacked Off who are campaigning to achieve that outcome. Contrary to the impression given in the press, Hacked Off is not a collection of luvvies. They are mainly lawyers, journalists and victims of press abuse (something which the Daily Mail may try to claim it has acknowledged here).

In recent weeks, the press has bombarded its readers with warnings that the Government is threatening to destroy centuries of press freedom by imposing financial penalties on publishers which do not sign-up to IMPRESS, the “state regulator” (no, actually it’s not – it’s just a regulator). These warnings are utterly misleading on so many levels. I have published my brief research into the deception and made a more detailed submission to the Department for Culture Media and Sport and the Home Office.

See also:  Brexit: supreme logic required

We expect our press to inform the public and hold power to account. That is why press freedom is valued so highly. It is beyond irony that those very freedoms are being used to flood the public with misinformation in a campaign to get the government to bend to the publishers’ will. It’s just another demonstration of how much our press needs a regulator that lives up to Leveson.

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

Related articles on this website
It seems that, when it comes to Brexit, we can’t trust anyone to get their facts right. Not even lawyers. At least, not Lawyers for a People’s Vote (LfaPV). I don’t ...
Read the complete article
I was disappointed to read recently that the UK has dropped to 40th place in the World Press Freedom Index. Among the 39 countries which are said to offer the ...
Read the complete article
I keep hearing that last Friday's agreement between the UK and the EU 27 means that a hard Brexit is off the table. Well, I'm looking at the table and ...
Read the complete article
It has been a strange week for those of us who took a keen interest in press regulation as a result of the Leveson Inquiry. On Tuesday evening, Sir Alan Moses, ...
Read the complete article
What are the chances of being able to write a 2,000 page report on press regulation and walk away with all-party support (or even all-Party support)? Plainly, not very high. ...
Read the complete article
The press are against statutory regulation of their activities. That is the message they have been sending to the Leveson Inquiry. But most people fear that, without a legislative underpinning, ...
Read the complete article
Like many people, I have been following The Leveson Inquiry intermittently. As someone with a background in regulatory policy, I am particularly interested in the way that many witnesses have ...
Read the complete article
Lovers of Life on Mars may have thought that DCI Gene Hunt was giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee yesterday. In fact, it was a real (ex-)cop, former ...
Read the complete article
Lawyers for Alternative Facts?
Reporters Sans Frontieres: not my idea of a knock out
Hard Brexit is dead. Long live … hard Brexit
Moses and the Culture Secretary
Leveson – Is the battle already lost?
Leveson could legislate for a non-statutory regulator
Leveson and the Living Trees
“I’m Hayman and I’m ’aving hoops”