Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts. (You can view my privacy policy here.)


RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)


Redknapp admits his guilt?

We all know that Harry Redknapp is innocent of tax evasion. A jury has decided that unanimously.

But readers of The Times newspaper may have been a little surprised by the verdict. Redknapp had, after all, admitted criminality. Or so the paper reported on 28 January 2012. Quoting evidence given during the trial, the paper reported Redknapp as saying in a taped interview with the police:

“I’ve brought up a fantastic family to try and nick a few quid off the income tax.”

A whole family of tax-dodging Redknapps? Surely this can’t be right. Something must have been taken out of context. But no. Context doesn’t help. The full quote was:

“I’m not going to ruin my wife and my wife’s life and my boys’ lives. I’ve brought up a fantastic family to try and nick a few quid off the income tax.”

So the man most likely to be England’s next football manager believed that tax dodging was essential in order to avoid his and family’s life being ruined. And yet … And yet … it just doesn’t seem to fit with everything else in his evidence. What if we try that quote just once more, but this time with a change in the punctuation:

“I’m not going to ruin my wife and my wife’s life and my boys’ lives – I’ve brought up a fantastic family – to try and nick a few quid off the income tax.”

So there was criminality after all. Criminal mispunctuation by The Times.

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

See also:  When did you stop ****ing your wife?

Related articles on this website
Much has been written about the harrowing cross-examination of Milly Dowler’s family during the trial of Levi Bellfield. One of the strangest remarks was written by Peter Lodder QC, Chairman ...
Read the complete article
On a train journey this afternoon, I was reading Lord Bingham’s The Rule of Law. Later, back at my desk, I saw the Football Association’s most recent nonsensical disciplinary announcement. ...
Read the complete article
I’m not sure quite how to say this. So I’ll say it twice:Yesterday, a young graduate won her claim against the government’s back-to-work scheme. She argued that the regulations and ...
Read the complete article
When Queen’s Park Rangers appointed Neil Warnock as manager, a little over a year ago, I was aghast: “Fourteen years since QPR last played in the Premier League, but if ...
Read the complete article
In an episode of The West Wing from 2002, the (fictional) US President. Jed Bartlet, prepares for a presidential debate by considering how he should answer a question designed to ...
Read the complete article
The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), Alison Saunders, says that juries apply a “much higher test” than prosecutors do when deciding whether to pursue a case. If that is true, ...
Read the complete article
I keep reading expressions of anger that the Metropolitan Police sought a court order under the Official Secrets Act to uncover the Guardian’s source behind the phone hacking story (here, ...
Read the complete article
Much has been written about the Government’s appeal to the Supreme Court in the Brexit case. Political commentators tell us that the appeal is very likely to fail. Many lawyers ...
Read the complete article
Justice under examination
FA Law
Journalists in a tiz at Supreme Court’s win-win decision
Neil and Adel: A love that cannot speak the name
Victim statements: are they having the wrong impact?
Testing times for the Director of Public Prosecutions
Hasty Copper and the Paper with Secrets
Brexit: supreme logic required