Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts. (You can view my privacy policy here.)


 

RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)

Topics

How cool is necrophilia, Judge?

On Wednesday, the Lord Chief Justice (the appropriately named, Lord Judge) bemoaned the continuing move towards overly prescriptive legislation, saying:

“There is a guideline for judges passing sentence on those rather odd people who have sexual intercourse with a corpse. There’s a different possible approach depending on whether it’s with the same corpse or a different corpse. It’s all to do with the idea that you can legislate for just about every possibility.”

On the same day, I was at the AGM of the Civil Mediation Council, hearing about more regulation of mediators. Why?

I am in favour of regulation when there is some harm that might occur in the absence of those regulations. But I remain to be convinced that mediators have the capacity to do great harm.

Going to mediation is an entirely voluntary process. The costs are low – very low, in comparison with the costs of paying lawyers to take a case to trial. And settlement is an entirely voluntary decision by the parties involved. Mediation may not always lead to a settlement, but I have yet to hear any evidence to suggest that there is a problem to be regulated away. So why not leave well alone? At least until a specific problem has been identified.

The Lord Chief Justice’s example of overly prescriptive regulation reminded me of a line from a rock musical I saw 35 years ago: “Necrophilia is no longer cool.” I have worked in the regulatory arena for long enough to know that regulation hasn’t lost its “coolth” yet. But, as I have written here before, we do need to think carefully about how we regulate – and how much.

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

See also:  A horse. A zebra. Or maybe it’s a fish?

Related articles on this website
I keep reading expressions of anger that the Metropolitan Police sought a court order under the Official Secrets Act to uncover the Guardian’s source behind the phone hacking story (here, ...
Read the complete article
Regular readers of this blog must be sick to death by now of me repeating how much damage accounting standards are doing to pension schemes (here, here, here and, even ...
Read the complete article
A friend writes to tell me that she has been appointed to the Future of Banking Commission set up by Which?. Which reminds me that I have yet to return ...
Read the complete article
What are the chances of being able to write a 2,000 page report on press regulation and walk away with all-party support (or even all-Party support)? Plainly, not very high. ...
Read the complete article
Regulation An unusual range of expert knowledge, intellectual rigour and playfulness in making us challenge our ideas. Chris Kenny, Former Director of Regulatory Policy, Oftel I have had extensive policy involvement over the ...
Read the complete article
It has been a strange week for those of us who took a keen interest in press regulation as a result of the Leveson Inquiry. On Tuesday evening, Sir Alan Moses, ...
Read the complete article
I’m not sure quite how to say this. So I’ll say it twice:Yesterday, a young graduate won her claim against the government’s back-to-work scheme. She argued that the regulations and ...
Read the complete article
The press are against statutory regulation of their activities. That is the message they have been sending to the Leveson Inquiry. But most people fear that, without a legislative underpinning, ...
Read the complete article
Hasty Copper and the Paper with Secrets
Accountants in a tangle with Webb
Banking on it
Leveson – Is the battle already lost?
Regulation
Moses and the Culture Secretary
Journalists in a tiz at Supreme Court’s win-win decision
Leveson could legislate for a non-statutory regulator