Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts. (You can view my privacy policy here.)


 

RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)

Topics

Leveson could legislate for a non-statutory regulator

The press are against statutory regulation of their activities. That is the message they have been sending to the Leveson Inquiry. But most people fear that, without a legislative underpinning, press regulation will be toothless. How then to reconcile those two opposing views? Do it like this …

If the independent regulator failed to deliver, the statutory body would be ready with power to step in

Create a statutory regulator which has two roles: (1) to exempt from its own regulation all those members of the press who are regulated by another suitable body and (2) to regulate the rest.

If the press can create – or persuade someone else to create – an independent regulatory body which has sharp enough teeth to police the press, the statutory body need do no more than keep a beady eye on the independent regulator. There would be no need to carry on any direct regulation of its own.

But if the independent regulator failed to deliver, the statutory body would be there with the power to step in – a power that had already been enacted.

What if the press couldn’t all agree on a suitable regulator? They don’t need to. With a regime like this, there would be no objection to having multiple regulators. So long as each of the regulators was approved by the statutory body, that would be allowed.

In practice, the cost of having multiple regulators would most likely deter the individual press barons from wanting more than one regulator, but that would be their choice – and at their expense. The State should pay only for the statutory body, not for the independent regulators.

See also:  DC taking a leaf out of DC?

And if one or more publishers wanted to opt out of independent regulation and submit themselves to regulation by the statutory body, that could be allowed too.

[Note: I have written previously about who should be covered by this regulatory system – see Leveson and the Living Trees.]

[Update (30 November 2012): Lord Justice Leveson has now published his report. The ideas articulated above are central to his recommendations although, in the immediate aftermath of the report’s publication, they have proved to be the most contentious – see Leveson – Is the battle already lost?]

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

Related articles on this website
It seems that, when it comes to Brexit, we can’t trust anyone to get their facts right. Not even lawyers. At least, not Lawyers for a People’s Vote (LfaPV). I don’t ...
Read the complete article
Like many people, I have been following The Leveson Inquiry intermittently. As someone with a background in regulatory policy, I am particularly interested in the way that many witnesses have ...
Read the complete article
What are the chances of being able to write a 2,000 page report on press regulation and walk away with all-party support (or even all-Party support)? Plainly, not very high. ...
Read the complete article
Much has been written about the Government’s appeal to the Supreme Court in the Brexit case. Political commentators tell us that the appeal is very likely to fail. Many lawyers ...
Read the complete article
In 2012, when I clicked on a link in order to watch a family friend appear in front of the Leveson Inquiry, I little realised just how much the subject ...
Read the complete article
It has been a strange week for those of us who took a keen interest in press regulation as a result of the Leveson Inquiry. On Tuesday evening, Sir Alan Moses, ...
Read the complete article
Lovers of Life on Mars may have thought that DCI Gene Hunt was giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee yesterday. In fact, it was a real (ex-)cop, former ...
Read the complete article
I’m not sure quite how to say this. So I’ll say it twice:Yesterday, a young graduate won her claim against the government’s back-to-work scheme. She argued that the regulations and ...
Read the complete article
Lawyers for Alternative Facts?
Leveson and the Living Trees
Leveson – Is the battle already lost?
Brexit: supreme logic required
A pressing need for regulation …
Moses and the Culture Secretary
“I’m Hayman and I’m ’aving hoops”
Journalists in a tiz at Supreme Court’s win-win decision