Tag: Justice
Leveson – Is the battle already lost?
What are the chances of being able to write a 2,000 page report on press regulation and walk away with all-party support (or even all-Party support)? Plainly, not very high. This final stage of the inquiry could have been – should have been – handled differently. Read more »
Posted: November 30th, 2012 under Topics: Human Rights, Justice, Law, Mediation, Politics, Regulation
Leveson could legislate for a non-statutory regulator
The press are against statutory regulation of their activities. That is the message they have been sending to the Leveson Inquiry. But most people fear that, without a legislative underpinning, press regulation will be toothless. How then to reconcile those two opposing views? Do it like this … Read more »
Posted: July 26th, 2012 under Topics: Justice, Law, Politics, Regulation
Leveson and the Living Trees
Like many people, I have been following The Leveson Inquiry intermittently. As someone with a background in regulatory policy, I am particularly interested in the way that many witnesses have expressed a concern that regulation of the press has become inseparable from regulation of the individual because the internet has given any individual with a website (or even just a Twitter account) the power to be a journalist. I think the argument is flawed. Read more »
Posted: June 12th, 2012 under Topics: Justice, Law, Politics, Regulation
FA Law
On a train journey this afternoon, I was reading Lord Bingham’s The Rule of Law. Later, back at my desk, I saw the Football Association’s most recent nonsensical disciplinary announcement. There seem to be some lessons for the FA in what I was reading. Read more »
Posted: April 10th, 2012 under Topics: Football, Justice, Law, QPR, Regulation, Sport
You better (not) knock, knock, knock on wood
As an accredited mediator, it’s always of interest to me when I come across an example of a dispute which is better resolved through mediation than through litigation. These stories provide useful examples of the benefits of a mediated settlement.
Even more interesting was the example I came across just a few days ago in which I could just as easily have been one of the parties in need of mediation. Read more »
Posted: March 27th, 2012 under Topics: Happened to me, Justice, Law, Mediation
Court takes a liberty with our freedom
The European Court of Human Rights has decided today that police “kettling” of crowds – holding them within a police cordon for hours at a time – does not deprive them of their liberty. Read more »
Posted: March 15th, 2012 under Topics: Human Rights, Justice, Law, Politics, Regulation
Hasty Copper and the Paper with Secrets
I keep reading expressions of anger that the Metropolitan Police sought a court order under the Official Secrets Act to uncover the Guardian’s source behind the phone hacking story (here, here, here, here, and here, to name but a few). I’m not convinced. Read more »
Posted: September 22nd, 2011 under Topics: Communication, Justice, Law
What equal pay teaches us about the Human Rights Act
The European courts have been causing controversy (again). Judgements handed down in Brussels and Strasbourg have left conservatives (small “c”) aghast and Liberals (big and small “L”) defending the rights-based approach. But scratch beneath the surface and, often, it’s not the rights that objectors object to. Read more »
Posted: September 1st, 2011 under Topics: Actuarial, Finance, Human Rights, Justice, Law, Pensions, Politics
“I’m Hayman and I’m ’aving hoops”
Lovers of Life on Mars may have thought that DCI Gene Hunt was giving evidence to the Home Affairs Select Committee yesterday. In fact, it was a real (ex-)cop, former Assistant Commissioner Andy Hayman. Read more »
Posted: July 13th, 2011 under Topics: Justice, Law, Politics, Regulation, TV
Justice under examination
Much has been written about the harrowing cross-examination of Milly Dowler’s family during the trial of Levi Bellfield. One of the strangest remarks was written by Peter Lodder QC, Chairman of the Bar, in his desire to defend the colleague who had conducted the cross-examination. Read more »