Site menu:

Site search

Get Updates

Enter your email address to hear about new posts.


RSS Recent Posts

Archives (month)

Topics

  1. Accounting
  2. Actuarial
  3. Banks
  4. Communication
  5. Economics
  6. Fair Value
  7. Finance
  8. Football
  9. Happened to me
  10. Human Rights
  11. Justice
  12. Law
  13. Management
  14. Mediation
  15. Pensions
  16. Politics
  17. Professions
  18. QPR
  19. Regulation
  20. Sport
  21. TV

Inauspicious Anniversary

Saturday 12 September 2009

I’ve had a difficult 24 hours. Booked a flight to the US (where I am now). Figured I needed to leave on Friday (yesterday) in order to meet the schedule that brings me to the US. It wasn’t until I had to give someone my travel dates that I realised I’d picked September 11th to fly on American Airlines! On the upside, the plane was practically empty, even if everyone looked a little jumpy.

Which goes only part of the way to explaining why I am sitting on a back porch in North Carolina, with my new ultra-lite laptop (very light, because most of the standard features seem to be missing) typing this before heading to Chicago on Monday to speak on the regulation of professions.

I grew up in a world that believed it was unethical for professionals to advertise. No, it wasn’t! That was a rule designed to make it harder for new firms to break into the market. A classic example of anti-competitive practice masquerading as a code of “ethics”. All that was swept away in the mid-1980s.

Enron, Equitable Life and other famous collapses exposed additional weaknesses in the way professions policed their members. The result was regulatory oversight bodies, such as the Professional Oversight Board for accountants and actuaries and the Legal Services Board for lawyers. But then the credit crunch exposed weaknesses in the regulatory bodies as well. It worries me that we don’t yet have a grip on what we are trying to achieve through regulation.

More on that in due course … Next stop, Chicago. I am due there on Monday, the first anniversary of Lehman’s collapse.

Sign up for updates by Email, Twitter or RSS Feed.

More articles
I see the Treasury has been consulting on its new approach to financial regulation. Some of the main ideas – reforming the tri-partite model – have been discussed at length elsewhere. What caught my eye were the issues which address our new government’s approach to regulatory culture. The first issue to leap off the page was the question whether the principles of good regulatory practice should be enshrined in the ...
Read the complete article
A friend writes to tell me that she has been appointed to the Future of Banking Commission set up by Which?. Which reminds me that I have yet to return to my September Blog on the subject of regulation, in particular the regulation of banks. I don’t subscribe to the “too big to fail” approach. I don’t believe it is about size. Who, prior to 2007, would have thought that Northern ...
Read the complete article
The press are against statutory regulation of their activities. That is the message they have been sending to the Leveson Inquiry. But most people fear that, without a legislative underpinning, press regulation will be toothless. How then to reconcile those two opposing views? Do it like this …If the independent regulator failed to deliver, the statutory body would be ready with power to step inCreate a statutory regulator which has ...
Read the complete article
On Wednesday, the Lord Chief Justice (the appropriately named, Lord Judge) bemoaned the continuing move towards overly prescriptive legislation, saying:“There is a guideline for judges passing sentence on those rather odd people who have sexual intercourse with a corpse. There’s a different possible approach depending on whether it’s with the same corpse or a different corpse. It’s all to do with the idea that you can legislate for just about ...
Read the complete article
Today’s big argument is said to be about privacy and the public interest. I think there must be more to it that that. Most commentators seem to be going round in circles. Prince Harry, currently third in line to the throne, went to a hotel room and took his clothes off in the presence of a bunch of other people. One of his companions (or maybe several) took photos and made ...
Read the complete article
It has been a strange week for those of us who took a keen interest in press regulation as a result of the Leveson Inquiry. On Tuesday evening, Sir Alan Moses, chairman of the Independent Press Standards Organisation, gave the inaugural lecture named in honour of that body, in which he spoke scathingly of those who challenge the effectiveness of his organisation, witheringly of the alternative press regulator and irreverently of ...
Read the complete article
What are the chances of being able to write a 2,000 page report on press regulation and walk away with all-party support (or even all-Party support)? Plainly, not very high. This final stage of the inquiry could have been – should have been – handled differently.The judicial model is to make findings of fact and reach a judgement at the same time. The regulatory model is different.Leveson has proposed an ...
Read the complete article
In the early days of my career, I occasionally dreamed that I had failed my professional exams and was being summoned back for a re-sit. Since I never actually practised in the discipline in which I qualified, I’m not sure what game my subconscious was playing with me. But last week I dreamed I was back at university… only to wake up and find that I was. It left me wondering ...
Read the complete article
Probably the best regulator in the world?
Banking on it
Leveson could legislate for a non-statutory regulator
How cool is necrophilia, Judge?
Harry’s Bottom and the Right to Privacy
Moses and the Culture Secretary
Leveson – Is the battle already lost?
Regulatory dreams and economic nightmares